New NJ Law Expands Liability for Sidewalk Slip and Fall Injuries

A landmark New Jersey Supreme Court ruling now holds commercial property owners liable for sidewalk maintenance.

Icy sidewalk outside a commercial property in New Jersey

When a fall happens outside the store, not inside it

You fall on an icy public sidewalk just outside a store, not inside the building. For years, that location made a major difference in New Jersey premises-liability cases. The Supreme Court's 2024 decision in Padilla v. Young expanded the duty commercial property owners owe on the public sidewalks abutting their property.

Until recently, proving liability in that situation was difficult. Under longstanding New Jersey common law, property owners -- whether residential or commercial -- were only liable for sidewalks they negligently constructed or repaired, not for general maintenance.

What Padilla v. Young changed

That changed in Padilla v. Young, 257 N.J. 540 (2024). In this decision, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that commercial property owners now have a legal duty to maintain the public sidewalks that abut their property. The Court emphasized fundamental fairness, concluding that these owners are responsible for keeping sidewalks in reasonably good condition -- not just structurally sound, but also safely maintained.

This decision broadens the options for injured pedestrians seeking compensation. Victims no longer need to prove that a sidewalk was broken or improperly constructed -- only that it was poorly maintained, such as being left icy or slick without treatment.

An Illustrative Decision Point

Consider a hypothetical fall on an icy sidewalk beside a storefront shortly after opening. The location alone does not resolve the claim. Counsel would still need to identify the property and business relationships, document the condition, determine what maintenance occurred, and connect the fall to the claimed injuries.

Preserve photographs or video of the sidewalk, the exact location and time, witness information, the incident report, footwear, and medical records. Records concerning inspection, snow or ice treatment, and maintenance responsibility may also matter. The decision question is not simply whether Padilla exists, but whether the evidence supports duty, breach, causation, and damages in the particular setting. This hypothetical does not predict liability.

Reviewed by

Britt J. Simon, Esq.

Managing Partner

Simon Law Group, LLC

Reviewed May 25, 2026

Call us today

(800) 709-1131

No-cost consultation request
Available Mon-Fri, 8:30 AM-5:00 PM

Our offices

Somerville accepts office visits. Morristown and Flemington are by appointment.

The Brief

Get future legal updates by email.

Subscribe for practical New Jersey legal updates and new firm resources. Do not send confidential facts through this form.

Choose your updates
This is a quick security check to keep automated spam off the form.

Unsubscribe anytime. We don’t share your email, and we don’t fill your inbox.

Related practice areas

Related articles

Consult

What happened, and which evidence may disappear first?

Share the incident date, treatment status, available photographs, reports, witnesses, and insurance information.

Consultation request. There is no charge to send this form or to talk through your situation.

Address

Use your mailing address. It helps us understand the county, urgency, and follow-up logistics.

A short summary is plenty. We’ll request documents at the right time.

This is a quick security check to keep automated spam off the form.

Contacting us does not make Simon Law Group your lawyer. Representation begins only after you and the firm sign a written engagement agreement.