Legal landscape note: This article was originally published in 2017 and describes the law as it stood at that time. New Jersey law changes frequently.
Overview
Your divorce was finalized years ago, your child is in their mid-twenties, and now you are being asked -- or ordered -- to help pay for graduate school. Can a New Jersey court actually require that? The established framework under Newburgh v. Arrigo, 88 N.J. 529 (1982), governs parents' obligations for undergraduate education, but the extension of that obligation to post-graduate education is far less settled -- and increasingly contested.
A 2017 New Jersey trial court ruling considered whether an adult child could attempt to prove a claim for graduate-school contribution. It did not turn every advanced degree into a parental obligation. The dispute still required a hearing on the family's history, the proposed program, each person's resources, and the child's relationship with the parent from whom contribution was sought.
The Newburgh Framework
Under Newburgh v. Arrigo, New Jersey courts evaluate 12 factors when determining whether parents should contribute to a child's college education, including:
- Whether the parent would have contributed to college costs if the marriage had remained intact
- The financial resources of both parents
- The child's ability to earn income during school
- The availability of financial aid
- The child's academic performance and commitment to education
For a real family, those factors translate into records and decisions. Was the program discussed before enrollment? Did the child apply for aid, scholarships, or employer reimbursement? Is the degree a defined professional requirement or an open-ended continuation of school? Can either parent contribute without abandoning ordinary living expenses or retirement needs? The answers matter more than the degree's label.
Graduate School: A Different Question
Graduate school presents distinct issues from undergraduate education:
- The child is typically an adult: By graduate school, most students are over 23 and potentially emancipated under New Jersey law
- The child has earning capacity: Graduate students often work, have scholarships, or receive employer tuition reimbursement
- The financial burden is greater: Graduate programs can cost significantly more than undergraduate degrees
- The benefit accrues primarily to the child: Unlike undergraduate education, which courts view as a foundational necessity, graduate education is more often seen as career advancement for the adult child
The 2017 Ruling
In a notable 2017 decision, a New Jersey trial judge found that an adult child over the age of 23 of divorced parents could potentially demonstrate that a noncustodial parent should be required to contribute to graduate school expenses. The court scheduled a hearing to evaluate the specific circumstances, including the parties' financial situations, the child's academic record, and the availability of alternative funding sources.
The ruling did not establish a blanket obligation. It allowed the claim to be tested on evidence rather than rejected solely because the program was graduate school.
Emancipation Considerations
Emancipation in New Jersey is not automatic at age 18 or 21. Under N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.67 et seq. and established case law, a child is emancipated when they are "beyond the sphere of influence" of their parents -- typically when they complete their education, obtain full-time employment, or become financially independent.
A child enrolled in graduate school may argue they remain unemancipated, while the noncustodial parent may contend that graduate study does not warrant continued support.
Key Takeaways
- Newburgh v. Arrigo governs college support but its application to graduate school is limited
- Graduate school support is evaluated case by case, not as an automatic obligation
- A child's age, earning capacity, and financial aid availability are critical factors
- Emancipation status must be determined before assessing graduate school support obligations
- A 2017 NJ ruling recognized graduate school support may be appropriate in some cases
- Before taking a position, compare the existing order, emancipation history, school records, funding package, family communications, and each person's current finances
An attorney can evaluate how the existing judgment and current law apply to that record. Responsible advice should distinguish what a trial-level decision permits a party to argue from what an appellate court has made binding.
Reviewed by Britt J. Simon, Esq., Managing Partner -- Simon Law Group, LLC -- May 2026
The content on this website is for general informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. Every case is different. You should consult with a qualified attorney before making any legal decisions. Contacting us through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.