Triparenting: Is It Better Than Two?

NJ court addressed tri-parenting custody arrangement involving biological parents and a same-sex spouse.

Tri-parenting custody arrangement in New Jersey

Legal landscape note: This article was originally published in 2016 and describes the law as it stood at that time. New Jersey law changes frequently.

Two fathers, one mother, one child: what happens when three adults who agreed to raise a child together stop agreeing? A New Jersey court recently had to answer exactly that. In a recent Ocean County Superior Court case, Judge Stephanie Wauters ruled on the issue of child custody between three people. Included in the proceedings was the biological father, his same-sex spouse, and the biological mother, of whom were attempting to create a “tri-parenting relationship.” The biological father, ‘D.G.’ had artificially conceived with ‘K.S.’, who had been friends with both spouses for a long time.

Unfortunately, the spouses and ‘K.S.’ disagreed on some of the arrangements. ‘K.S.’ wanted to move to another state with the child, and ‘D.G.’ along with his spouse, ‘S.H.,’ felt it was not in the best interests of the child to do so. Several consent agreements were made between the two sides, but a nineteen-day custody battle ensued in court.

In a lengthy opinion, the Judge ordered all three parties to have joint residential custody, which she felt was in the best interests of the child. The child would spend equal time with her mother in Point Pleasant Beach, and her two fathers in Princeton. The Judge said, “[the child’s] having to endure frequent travel time…due to a joint residential custodial plan is heavily outweighed by the long bond and relationship the child will be able to maintain and experience in both households in New Jersey.” S.H. attempted to establish himself as a legal parent, maintaining the argument that he is a “psychological parent.” However, the Judge disagreed. She stated that, “the court does not have the jurisdiction to create a new recognition of legal parentage other than which already exists [through] genetic contribution, adoption, or gestational primacy.” In other words, she ruled that the court cannot simply make someone else a parent when biological and/or adoptive parents already exist simply because a party wishes to do so.

Source: New Jersey Law Journal, "Court Takes On Same-Sex Couple's Tri-Parenting Model."

Reviewed by

Britt J. Simon, Esq.

Managing Partner

Simon Law Group, LLC

Reviewed May 25, 2026

Call us today

(800) 709-1131

No-cost consultation request
Available Mon-Fri, 8:30 AM-5:00 PM

Our offices

Somerville accepts office visits. Morristown and Flemington are by appointment.

The Brief

Get future legal updates by email.

Subscribe for practical New Jersey legal updates and new firm resources. Do not send confidential facts through this form.

Choose your updates
This is a quick security check to keep automated spam off the form.

Unsubscribe anytime. We don’t share your email, and we don’t fill your inbox.

Related practice areas

Related articles

Consult

Which family decision needs attention now?

Start with the current order or agreement, the disputed decision, and any real deadline.

Consultation request. There is no charge to send this form or to talk through your situation.

Address

Use your mailing address. It helps us understand the county, urgency, and follow-up logistics.

This form is reviewed as family-law intake. For criminal or DWI charges, use the criminal-defense page or call the firm.

This is a quick security check to keep automated spam off the form.

Contacting us does not make Simon Law Group your lawyer. Representation begins only after you and the firm sign a written engagement agreement.