Choose fiduciaries before choosing documents.
Executor, trustee, guardian, POA agent, healthcare proxy, and backups are often the hardest planning decisions.
The SECURE Act collapsed the inherited-IRA stretch -- most non-spouse beneficiaries must withdraw within 10 years. SRTs improve creditor-protection planning, distribution control, and structured family planning within the new framework.
The calls follow patterns. The 65-year-old executive whose $2.1M IRA represents the family's largest single asset, who has been told her current direct-beneficiary designations no longer fit the family's situation. The widow whose late husband's IRA has just transferred to her and who is planning for her own death where the children will be the beneficiaries -- under the SECURE Act 10-year rule. The parent whose adult child has substance-use challenges and shouldn't receive a large lump sum on death. The family whose disabled adult child receives SSI and Medicaid and would lose eligibility if she received an inherited IRA outright. The professional whose substantial 401(k) needs to be coordinated with an estate plan that didn't anticipate the post-SECURE Act framework.
Retirement accounts are often the largest assets in NJ estates. The SECURE Act (effective 2020) eliminated the inherited-IRA stretch for most beneficiaries, accelerating taxation and reducing family wealth preservation. SRTs preserve the planning flexibility that direct beneficiary designations lose -- at the cost of additional structure and complexity.
Pre-SECURE: Most non-spouse beneficiaries could "stretch" required minimum distributions over their own life expectancy. A 30-year-old inheriting a parent's IRA could spread distributions over decades.
Post-SECURE (effective January 1, 2020): Most non-spouse beneficiaries are "non-eligible designated beneficiaries" subject to the 10-year rule -- entire inherited account must be distributed within 10 years of owner's death. SECURE 2.0 (December 2022) added clarifications.
The 10-year rule and the eligible-designated-beneficiary categories both sit in the required-minimum-distribution provisions of 26 U.S.C. § 401(a)(9)1. The practical consequence is blunt: an inherited account that once could have stretched across a 30-year-old beneficiary's working life now compresses into a decade, and the compression usually pushes those distributions into the beneficiary's highest-earning, highest-bracket years. That is the problem an SRT is built to manage -- not by changing the 10-year deadline, which it cannot, but by controlling who receives the money, when, and with what protection around it.
Eligible designated beneficiaries retain extended distribution options:
Citations
Naming an individual directly on the beneficiary form is simple, and for many families it is the right answer. But the beneficiary form hands the account to that person outright -- on the day it is inherited, the money is theirs, exposed to their creditors, their divorce, their judgment, and their spending. A trust named as beneficiary keeps the inherited account inside a structure you designed, governed by terms you chose, administered by a trustee you selected. That trade -- additional structure and cost in exchange for control and protection -- is what the following benefits buy.
Under Treas. Reg. § 1.401(a)(9)-4(b)1, a trust designated as IRA beneficiary must satisfy:
A trust meeting see-through requirements is treated as if its individual beneficiaries were the direct beneficiaries for distribution-rule purposes. A non-see-through trust faces less favorable rules.
Why this matters in practice: an inherited IRA distribution is income in respect of a decedent under 26 U.S.C. § 6912 -- it is taxable to whoever receives it, and it never received a step-up in basis at death. Qualifying as a see-through trust does not erase that tax, but it preserves the longer distribution timeline the beneficiary categories allow, which is what gives a trustee room to spread the income across years rather than absorbing it in a single compressed event. A drafting slip that costs the trust its see-through status can collapse that timeline, which is why these five requirements are treated as gating items rather than formalities.
Almost every SRT decision flows from one fork: when an RMD lands in the trust, does it pass straight through to the beneficiary, or can the trustee hold it? That single question determines how much control the trust keeps, how exposed the assets are to the beneficiary's creditors, and which income-tax rates apply. The SECURE Act 10-year rule shifted the calculus -- the two structures behave very differently once the entire account must come out within a decade.
For non-eligible designated beneficiaries (most non-spouse beneficiaries post-SECURE):
Annual RMDs during the 10 years depend on when the owner died. Under the 2024 final regulations (Treas. Reg. § 1.401(a)(9)-51; T.D. 10001), if the original owner died on or after the required beginning date (RBD), a non-eligible designated beneficiary must take annual required minimum distributions in years 1 through 9and empty the account by the end of year 10. If the owner died before the RBD, no annual distributions are required in years 1-9 -- the beneficiary may distribute in any pattern so long as the account is fully distributed by the end of year 10. This distinction changes SRT drafting: an accumulation SRT inheriting from an owner who died post-RBD must be prepared to receive and tax annual RMDs, not just a year-10 lump sum.
Citations
Disabled or chronically ill beneficiaries can be eligible designated beneficiaries -- preserving life-expectancy stretch. The SRT for a special-needs beneficiary should be drafted to:
An SRT earns its complexity only when there is something to protect or control. Where there is not, the honest answer is a clean beneficiary designation, and we say so. These are the situations where an SRT often adds cost without adding value:
The SECURE Act framework is federal, but the SRT lives inside a New Jersey estate, and a handful of state-law points shape the drafting. None of them changes the federal see-through analysis -- they sit on top of it.
Citations
An SRT is a trust specifically designed to be the beneficiary of retirement accounts (IRAs, 401(k)s, 403(b)s) on the owner's death. The SRT provides structured distribution to beneficiaries while improving creditor-protection planning, allowing trustee-controlled distributions, and managing the 10-year forced distribution requirement under the SECURE Act for non-eligible-designated-beneficiary inheritances. SRTs are increasingly used post-SECURE Act (effective 2020) because the elimination of 'stretch IRA' planning for most beneficiaries made trustee-controlled distribution structures more valuable.
Pre-SECURE: Most non-spouse beneficiaries of inherited retirement accounts could stretch required minimum distributions (RMDs) over their own life expectancy -- extending tax deferral for decades. Post-SECURE (effective January 1, 2020): Most non-spouse beneficiaries are 'non-eligible designated beneficiaries' who must withdraw the entire inherited account within 10 years of the original owner's death. Under the 2024 final regulations (T.D. 10001; Treas. Reg. § 1.401(a)(9)-5), if the owner died on or after the required beginning date, that beneficiary must also take annual RMDs in years 1-9; if the owner died before the required beginning date, only full distribution by year 10 is required. SECURE 2.0 (December 2022) added further clarifications. The 10-year rule produces accelerated taxation, larger annual distributions, and reduced family wealth preservation. Some 'eligible designated beneficiaries' (surviving spouses, minor children of the owner, disabled or chronically ill beneficiaries, beneficiaries not more than 10 years younger than owner) retain extended distribution options.
Trust beneficiary structures offer benefits the direct-beneficiary designation cannot: (1) Creditor-protection planning -- the beneficiary's interest in a properly drafted trust can be protected from many beneficiary-level creditors, divorces, lawsuits, and bankruptcies, subject to trust terms and governing law. (2) Trustee-controlled distribution -- avoiding lump-sum dissipation by beneficiaries unable to manage large distributions. (3) Special-needs protection -- trusts for disabled beneficiaries can preserve government benefits eligibility when properly drafted. (4) Estate-planning coordination -- the trust integrates with the broader plan rather than passing assets independently. (5) Multi-generational planning -- trust can continue beyond the initial beneficiary's lifetime. (6) Tax planning -- trust structures can sometimes optimize income-tax outcomes within the 10-year SECURE Act window.
Under Treas. Reg. § 1.401(a)(9)-4(b), a trust designated as IRA beneficiary qualifies for favorable RMD treatment only if it meets the 'see-through' requirements: (1) Valid trust under state law. (2) Trust is irrevocable or becomes irrevocable on owner's death. (3) Beneficiaries of the trust are identifiable from the trust document. (4) Documentation provided to the IRA custodian within prescribed timing. (5) All beneficiaries are 'individuals' (not entities like charities or estates) for purposes of the look-through. A see-through trust is treated as if its individual beneficiaries were the direct beneficiaries -- the trust 'sees through' to them for RMD calculation purposes. A non-see-through trust faces less favorable distribution rules (often 5-year rule for accounts inherited from owners who died before reaching required beginning date).
Two see-through trust structures: (1) Conduit trust -- RMDs from the inherited IRA are paid into the trust and immediately distributed out to the beneficiary. The trust acts as a pass-through. Pre-SECURE, conduit trusts allowed beneficiary life-expectancy stretch with trust-level control during the distribution period. Post-SECURE for non-eligible designated beneficiaries, the conduit trust requires distribution of the entire account within 10 years; the beneficiary receives the full amount on the 10-year mark (or smaller amounts earlier if directed). (2) Accumulation trust -- RMDs are paid into the trust but the trustee has discretion to retain them rather than distribute. The accumulated amounts are held for the beneficiary's benefit but subject to higher trust income-tax rates (compressed brackets that hit top rate at relatively low income levels). Accumulation trusts provide more control and creditor-protection planning but at a tax cost. Post-SECURE planning often favors accumulation trusts because the 10-year forced distribution makes the conduit approach less attractive -- the accumulation trust at least retains control.
Several: (1) Spousal beneficiary -- surviving spouses have unique IRA-rollover rights that produce better outcomes than trust structures in most cases. (2) Small account balances -- trust complexity isn't justified for IRAs under ~$200K-$300K. (3) Charitable beneficiary -- charity can be named directly without trust complications; charity is exempt from income tax on inherited IRA distributions. (4) Beneficiaries with no specific protection needs -- sophisticated adult beneficiaries without creditor concerns can often manage direct inheritance. (5) Where simplicity is paramount and the family is comfortable with direct beneficiary designation. SRT planning is most useful for families with substantial retirement accounts, beneficiaries needing creditor protection or distribution control, special-needs beneficiaries, or coordinated multi-generational planning objectives.
How we help: We review each account and plan rule, beneficiary age and status, spousal rollover options, eligible-designated-beneficiary treatment, the ten-year rule, trustee selection, conduit or accumulation design, and income-tax tradeoffs. The resulting retirement-trust plan is bespoke, not a beneficiary-designation template. Request a retirement-beneficiary review.
Geographic scope
Confidential and no-obligation.
Consultation request. There is no charge to send this form or to talk through your situation.
We received your request. A member of our team will read it and follow up using the contact method you chose.
If a court date or deadline changes before we respond, call us at (800) 709-1131.
What Happens Next
Tell us what happened and how to reach you. That is enough for the first message.
We check the legal issue, county, and any court date or deadline, then make sure the appropriate attorney sees it.
Call, text, or email, whichever you prefer. Text consent is optional.
The attorney responsible for your matter remains directly involved in strategy, decisions, and legal work. Staff and other lawyers may assist, but they do not take over the representation.
Contacting us does not make Simon Law Group your lawyer. Representation begins only after you and the firm sign a written engagement agreement.
Share enough for our staff to review your message. A member of our team reads every chat that comes in.
Starting a chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pick a time for your consultation request
No consultation fee is charged. A requested time is not final until the firm confirms it.
Pick a date to see available times.
Reserve this time with a card on file
No consultation fee is charged today. Your card is saved as a temporary hold (authorization) only. You will not be charged unless a confirmed appointment is missed with no call or canceled too late under the firm's no-show policy.
Secure: 256-bit encrypted. Your card is entered directly with Stripe; the firm never sees your full card number.
The firm must confirm the appointment before it is final. If a confirmed appointment is missed or canceled too late, the no-show policy may apply.
Tell us who to text
We need your name and email before we can text you. A phone number alone is not enough to open your file.
Request a callback
This conversation has ended. Thank you for contacting Simon Law Group.